<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A+ for &#8216;America Exploits&#8217; and &#8216;Men Oppress&#8217; Answers on Sociology Exam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nasblog.org/2010/01/07/a-for-america-exploits-and-men-oppress-answers-on-sociology-exam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nasblog.org/2010/01/07/a-for-america-exploits-and-men-oppress-answers-on-sociology-exam/</link>
	<description>The National Association of Scholars: For reasoned scholarship in a free society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:44:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Dewey and Critical Thinking &#171; NAS Blog</title>
		<link>http://nasblog.org/2010/01/07/a-for-america-exploits-and-men-oppress-answers-on-sociology-exam/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[On Dewey and Critical Thinking &#171; NAS Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nasblog.org/?p=1054#comment-486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] also notes Candace de Russy&#8217;s post on how sociology today encourages students to hate America.     Categories: Uncategorized        Comments (0) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also notes Candace de Russy&#8217;s post on how sociology today encourages students to hate America.     Categories: Uncategorized        Comments (0) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SanePerson</title>
		<link>http://nasblog.org/2010/01/07/a-for-america-exploits-and-men-oppress-answers-on-sociology-exam/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SanePerson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 04:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nasblog.org/?p=1054#comment-399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I never mentioned anti-America. I believe this exam doesn&#039;t reflect critical thinking. A class is unlikely to discuss various viewpoints about whether 2+2=4, so that seems irrelevant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never mentioned anti-America. I believe this exam doesn&#8217;t reflect critical thinking. A class is unlikely to discuss various viewpoints about whether 2+2=4, so that seems irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: progressivescholar</title>
		<link>http://nasblog.org/2010/01/07/a-for-america-exploits-and-men-oppress-answers-on-sociology-exam/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[progressivescholar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 06:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nasblog.org/?p=1054#comment-392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An answer being regurgitated is very different than it being anti-America.  In Math class I was asked to regurgitate what 2+2 equals, without being asked to critically think about what &quot;2&quot; really is and why it exists.  Does that make math anti-America?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An answer being regurgitated is very different than it being anti-America.  In Math class I was asked to regurgitate what 2+2 equals, without being asked to critically think about what &#8220;2&#8243; really is and why it exists.  Does that make math anti-America?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SanePerson</title>
		<link>http://nasblog.org/2010/01/07/a-for-america-exploits-and-men-oppress-answers-on-sociology-exam/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SanePerson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nasblog.org/?p=1054#comment-390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the answer starting, &quot;Some say (whatever)&quot;, the student doesn&#039;t add, &quot;While others say (whatever)&quot;. That is the problem with this exam. The answers are regurgitated rather than critical thinking from what I can tell.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the answer starting, &#8220;Some say (whatever)&#8221;, the student doesn&#8217;t add, &#8220;While others say (whatever)&#8221;. That is the problem with this exam. The answers are regurgitated rather than critical thinking from what I can tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Response to Progressive Scholar &#171; NAS Blog</title>
		<link>http://nasblog.org/2010/01/07/a-for-america-exploits-and-men-oppress-answers-on-sociology-exam/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Response to Progressive Scholar &#171; NAS Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nasblog.org/?p=1054#comment-389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  January 12, 2010 Candace de Russy Leave a comment Go to comments    Last week I posted a copy of an exam from an introductory sociology class, forwarded to me by a colleague. The test was graded 100%. I [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  January 12, 2010 Candace de Russy Leave a comment Go to comments    Last week I posted a copy of an exam from an introductory sociology class, forwarded to me by a colleague. The test was graded 100%. I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: progressivescholar</title>
		<link>http://nasblog.org/2010/01/07/a-for-america-exploits-and-men-oppress-answers-on-sociology-exam/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[progressivescholar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 20:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nasblog.org/?p=1054#comment-376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don’t understand, what is the problem with this exam? It explores many common sociological theories. Not once does it proclaim that a certain way of thinking is right or wrong, nor does it discuss America and how the student should feel about it; in fact, the student actually begins an answer with “some say…”, which means that he or she recognizes that these are just theories, not objective fact.

The questions are asking the student to examine, explain, describe, compare, and analyze.   Contrary to your claim, all of these skills are highly desirable in most career fields. Sociology as a discipline emphasizes critical thinking, not blindly following the “old Soviet agitprop of the Fifties”, as you say.

I’m not sure what China and India have to do with this topic, since many universities in both countries offer comprehensive liberal arts and social science programs, including Sociology. I encourage you to do some research on Peking University, Tsinghua University, and Nankai University in China, and the Indian Institute of Technology in India, before assuming that they have eschewed all humanities and social sciences (“hate-America” fields?) in favor of technology, mathematics, and engineering – which are, apparently, fields that really love America.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t understand, what is the problem with this exam? It explores many common sociological theories. Not once does it proclaim that a certain way of thinking is right or wrong, nor does it discuss America and how the student should feel about it; in fact, the student actually begins an answer with “some say…”, which means that he or she recognizes that these are just theories, not objective fact.</p>
<p>The questions are asking the student to examine, explain, describe, compare, and analyze.   Contrary to your claim, all of these skills are highly desirable in most career fields. Sociology as a discipline emphasizes critical thinking, not blindly following the “old Soviet agitprop of the Fifties”, as you say.</p>
<p>I’m not sure what China and India have to do with this topic, since many universities in both countries offer comprehensive liberal arts and social science programs, including Sociology. I encourage you to do some research on Peking University, Tsinghua University, and Nankai University in China, and the Indian Institute of Technology in India, before assuming that they have eschewed all humanities and social sciences (“hate-America” fields?) in favor of technology, mathematics, and engineering – which are, apparently, fields that really love America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

